What the Filings Show

Nothing on this page is a characterization. Every number traces to specific pages of the four petition filings, and the key pages are embedded below so you can read them for yourself — click any image to see it full size.

The Facility Sweeps

Six senior-living facilities, seven collection events, one operation. The circulators moved through each facility in a single pass, carrying all four candidates’ petitions at once.

570 of 5,012 signature lines — 11.4 percent — came from these six addresses. 231 distinct residents signed; 84 of them signed all four candidates’ petitions in a single sitting. At Riverstone, the four candidates collected exactly 46 signatures apiece: four clipboards, one pass through the building. Matched against the voter rolls, every facility’s average signer age is north of 80 — roughly 85 at the memory-care facility, 83 among Moran’s broader facility signers, and 82 even among the residents Brouk personally signed up.

The Memory-Care Page

Exhibit A

Brouk petition, p. 86. Lines 3–6: four consecutive residents of 5901 NW 88th St — the memory-care facility — signed on June 19, 2026. The sworn circulator’s affidavit at the bottom of the page is signed by Melissa Moran. Look at line 13: the printed name “Mae Davis” is struck out and “Carrie Garrison” written above it. The column was filled in before the signers ever saw the page.

Full documents page →

The Riverstone Page

Exhibit B

Brouk petition, p. 69. Thirteen of fifteen signers list one address: 9000 N Congress Ave. All dated June 17. Not one unit number appears — though every resident of that community lives in a numbered apartment and the form provides the space. Sworn by Melissa Moran.

Read who signed line 6 →

The Paperwork Problems

The facility sweeps are the headline. The paper trail around them raises its own questions.

The affidavit nobody signed

Exhibit F — Brouk p. 17

Exhibit G — Cayer p. 16

Exhibit H — Kendall p. 17

Exhibit I — Robinson p. 16

The same circulator’s sheet appears in all four filings with the affiant’s signature and address blocks completely blank — and a notary seal applied anyway. Missouri law requires a sworn affidavit for every petition page; falsely making one is a class one election offense (§ 115.631, RSMo — up to five years).

The signature from the future

Exhibit L — Brouk p. 89

Line 14 is dated June 26 — one day after that sheet’s affidavit was notarized on June 25. The circulator swore every signature on the page was made in her presence before the oath was taken. This one couldn’t have been.

The same fifteen voters, filed twice

Exhibit J — Robinson p. 19

Exhibit K — Robinson p. 79

The identical fifteen-name roster — same names, same addresses, same June 13 date — on two sheets, both sworn by Dale Brouk. The second sheet isn’t even a Robinson petition: it’s headed for Holly Cayer, Collector — yet it was filed, stamped, and verification-marked inside Robinson’s filing. On the face of the record, fifteen voters were counted twice toward one candidate’s total, once on a sheet that doesn’t nominate him.

Columns filled in for the signers

Exhibit M — Robinson p. 89

Exhibit N — Cayer p. 79

Left — Robinson petition, p. 89: the printed-name column carries the wrong voter’s name, struck and corrected. Right — Cayer petition, p. 79: the signature reads “Wondene Godsey” beside the printed name “Wilma Parle.” Who was actually filling out these petitions?

Everything on this page described as a record fact appears on the face of documents filed with the Platte County Board of Election Commissioners — public records, reproduced here unaltered. Questions of what individual signers understood, and of anyone’s intent, are allegations that have been referred to law enforcement and state agencies for investigation; no charges have been filed and no agency has announced findings.